The
puzzle of Stein: why did she write the way she did? Well-read – she
shared Woolf's love of Shakespeare and the Elizabethans – and yet
her writing suggested to publishers and newspapers – and still
suggests to some readers today – that she had no knowledge of the
English language, was perhaps not an English speaker, and was
imperfectly educated; or if none of those applied was perhaps not in
possession of a sound mind. Well, none of those did apply, so why?
Why write as she did? Was it deliberately experimental, deliberately
original? She was – as she seemed to think, and to often imply –
a genius! Was it not deliberate but authentic? She was writing in
English as she thought, and so disregarded other people's plead for
commas. Why should she instruct her readers when to take a breath,
they can decide for themselves. Her writing may have been appalling,
but the newspapers she said always quoted it and what is more quoted
it correctly; they don't quote those they admire. So, she was
different; judged unreadable, but different. A new literary movement
with very few followers; and yet she believed totally in her ability
to write. You have to admire that if nothing else. She amused
herself, and that really is the whole point of creativity. Although
it's hard not to say when reading her, particularly The
Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas,
“What an ego!” and “Where is Alice?”
Picture credit: Gertrude Stein sitting on a sofa in her Paris studio (source: Library of Congress, Wikipedia).
From journal, April 2022.