Thursday, 25 April 2024

A Jam Session

HORKHEIMER: The regression of mankind is always a possibility.
ARDORNO: Barbarism always an option.
ME: Especially after a revolution.
NIETZSCHE: One herd. Everyone wants the same thing.
ME (interrupting): And things.
NIETZSCHE (continuing): Whoever thinks otherwise is ostracised.
ADORNO: State or government control grows in tandem with a growth in irrationality.
HORKHEIMER: The world is mad and will remain so. It is no longer possible to distinguish between good and bad.
HORKHEIMER: All hope lies in thought.
ADORNO: True thought is thought that does not insist on being right.
HORKHEIMER: But theory is theory; often bad theory, when what the world needs is fundamental change in both thought and action.
ADORNO: A happiness brought about by practice.
HORKHEIMER: Like eating roast goose. To not just think but to do. All our thoughts and actions must fit together.
ADORNO: The ideal, the next step, but not grasped directly, only indirectly.
HORKHEIMER: What is Marx's view?
MARX: The time is ripe for it.
HORKHEIMER: Or we take the fatalistic view and declare we cannot bring about change.
ADORNO: A message in a bottle, expressed as bluntly as possible, to change consciousness.

Picture credit: The Marx Lounge, Alfredo Jaar (source: WikiArt).

See Towards a New Manifesto by Theodor Adorno & Max Horkheimer (A Verso publication, translated by Rodney Livingstone). 

This twisted version written October 2022.

Thursday, 18 April 2024

The Eight-in-One Sermon

A “must” is something required by necessity and must never be compromised … But “free” is that in which I have choice, and may use or not … do not make a “must” out of what is “free”. This is a misuse of liberty.
We have the “right to speak”, but not the “right to enforce”. We should preach the Word, but the results must be solely left to God … Faith must come freely without coercion. No way!
we have no greater enemy than our own heart. God's reign is not in physical or outward objects, those things we are able to touch or sense, but in faith … [we all must have] a firm trust that Christ, the Son of God … has taken all our sins upon his shoulders … [however] we are not all the same and we do not all have the same amount of faith. The faith of one may be more robust than another.
we should treat our neighbour as God has treated us … [I] urge you to faith and love. I commend you to God.
there are many doubtful matters which we cannot resolve or find the answer to on our own … Confess to another person privately and hear the absolution … [or] confess to God directly. It is a comforting practice.
God bless. Amen.

Picture credit: Martin Luther, c.1532, Lucas Cranach the Elder (source: WikiArt).

See The Ninety-Five Theses and Other Writings (particularly Eight Sermons in Lent, 1522) by Martin Luther, Penguin Classics (translated by William R. Russell).

Written October 2022.




Thursday, 11 April 2024

Enemies of Literature

Some people are enemies of literature. Enemies of writers and readers. Afraid of words or the time it occupies.
Some people are afraid of the world, afraid of being out in it.
Some people prefer to theorise from a comfortable spot, all they need is the right materials; materials that supply the information they want or didn't know they wanted, information they can collect facts or phrases from. Their mind more a river than a place, moving and changing all the time, sifting and sorting. These people won't alter, not for anyone or anything. They like the old cotton-wool life: safe, familiar, contained.
These people, though, can still be shocked by the words they read: disturbed, repulsed, revolted, and wish an article hadn't been recommended them and they hadn't subsequently decided: yes, they would read.
Oh it was dark, too dark for them, this boy's, this man's perspective. This mind from 1975 was too depraved. Such darkness should have stayed private, been kept from public gaze.

Picture credit: The Sinner, 1904, John Collier (source: WikiArt).

Some thoughts, some phrase plagiarisms in reading First Love, Last Rites by Ian McEwan. 

Written October 2022.

Thursday, 4 April 2024

Imperfect Characters

We all have one, (said Rafferty), a guardian angel. Do we, thought I. Sometimes I'm not so sure … I strain to see the flying angel pinned to the lapel of his wrinkled blue jacket and fail, though I think I can just make out in the fading light a green and gold harp on the other.
He's told (by a woman) 'No one is given a life just to throw it away.' Is that what I'm doing too, I ask, though more quietly, less destructively than Rafferty. Rooted to place, yet exiled in the mind from society. Maybe.
Delia serves the dog its usual saucer of tea with milk. And I instantly see Nan serving Sam-dog the same in a bowl, his post-lunch, post-beach-walk thirst quenched, the same as ours.
Delia has lost the rapport she once had with God. The prayers she mouths less heartfelt now. And yet her heart feels all the things she has forgotten. That is why she cries. But why am I crying? I have forgotten what it feels like to be hugged, to be touched.
Mildred has loved too well. Her heart remembers and still registers (as does mine) thunderbolts. Yes, full of Desdemona. Yes, full of the youthful pursuit, of the unexpected visits of Mr Gentleman. Her heart given outright – never do that – but she gave. Unwisely, yes. With the voice of Molly Bloom. Yes! And all the style that Joyce possessed. Edna O'Brien, yes, I think I think I think.
*
Always a surprising twist – violent, confronting, shocking. Always a distance, a part cut off. Always a feeling, some similarity or some memory dredged up. Edna O'Brien, yes. A remoteness, a closeness. A contradiction, a desire. A boundary crossed. And an all too human response. A question, an answer, an observation. The reader asks of him or her self the same. Who am I, what am I. Repeats after vain McSorley, the quarry owner: 'Be absolute in your aim.' What aim, what aim. Then tells him or her self in a firm or fragile tone: It will come. Will come.
*
Something always remains, something always festers. Remembered love, lost love. An Edna O'Brien scene forever ruminated on. The hated scene, the public scene. Women's scenes – embarrassing their men, their children. Scenes between strangers, neighbours, mothers and daughters, cousins, lovers. A scene imagined, filled in, embellished even with my own imaginings. The actors my own imperfect characters: real known people.
A scene of taking tea at the Coughlan house: a matching China tea set (cups and saucers, milk jug and sugar bowl), serving plates with shop-bought eatables placed on nesting tables. The role of Mama played by my own dear long departed nan, the daughter-narrator played by a young version of my mother. I hear Mrs Coughlan debate with Nan whether it was best to whip cream with a fork or a beater, or to, in some instances, vigorously shake the container. Mrs Coughlan saying to Mum, the daughter: 'But why ever did you come back from Australia?' And Mum explaining it was only a long working holiday; they were always – her and her beau – going to return. Mrs Coughlan, though, is not really listening, she's lost in her own thoughts, someplace else.
The emotional landscape changes …
I'm with Miss Gilhooley, 'the Spinster', who has had her quota of love. Have I had mine? Was that all? Have I ever felt safe and confident with, next to anyone? Oh hollow heart. I've let myself go when once upon a time I would have cared more. I've turned more and more to literature for love, for new friendship, for all the experiences I won't have.
A different female narrator enters … then another … There's something to take from each ( a narcissistic exercise), something perhaps that only I know or see or feel unbeknownst to or unperceived by others.
Will my words, if they outlive me, also tell of a woman desperately trying to explain herself?
Oh Edna O'Brien, yes, you've done it now.
Literature, the only alchemy there is.

Picture credit: Desdemona, Frederic Leighton (source: WikiArt).

See Saints and Sinners by Edna O'Brien.

Journal entries, October 2022.