My
mother claims that whatever she says I always do the opposite. As
soon as she agrees with me, I swiftly jump to defend the other
option. Champion it with a sharpened sword. Lunge with a babble of
barbed words. Immediately see potential rather than danger in the
object I had, an instant ago, been attempting to fend off. And yet,
to my knowledge, she's never tried reverse psychology because in all
honesty I think, and she knows, I would outwit her.
If she
tells me what I want to hear, I wonder why she didn't tell me the
other. If she supports the opposing view, I think she's criticising
my judgement and I question her own. Is she saying I'm not capable or
that I'm foolish to consider it? whatever that IT happens to be. But
then if she reprimands me for being fault-finding I think she's
delusional, clearly playing the Mother card: my daughter's the BEST.
There's nothing she couldn't turn her hand to! Refusing to see or
choosing to ignore what I regard as glaring flaws, or else giving me
the answers she thinks I want, not need.
I
dislike having choices and yet I often reject the bird I'm offered,
if not in deed, then in words or thought; one not enough, I have to
catch another by enticing it to a flowering or fruit-laden tree, then
crossing my dry palm with mixed seed and copying its warble.
Wait...imitate...it will come...
A
flutter of wings, a rustle as it lands in the foliage and studies me
with its inquisitive bead eyes, its small perfectly-formed head
tilted to one side as it returns my whistle. Its call, of course,
much more beautiful and plaintive than my own. Dawn passed a few
hours ago and it's well before dusk, why do I sing thus? the notes of
its music convey. That much I have learned to read, but some solos
have a complexity quite beyond me to which I can't reply.
A
soundless language then develops; a comfortable stillness as if I
were a statue on a plinth in a peopled square put there to be
befriended by lonely or resting birds. The birds gradually cease to
be scared, take briefly to the air in a circling flight, flitting
across my line of vision to find a lofty spot to alight and settle.
Tentatively they will hop from my shoulder, down the length of my
extended arm to my open palm speckled with seed, and each time one
dares to feed, that seemingly friendly hand closes over their winged
body in a lax grip.
My
intention not to harm or cause undue stress, but to feel life
pulsating for its beat is stronger than mine. Beneath my curled
fingers, a tiny bird appears subdued and calm, yields to my touch as
if it understands my need. The eyes, like full stops, are firm and
trusting, dark dots of compassion, and the heart caged within the
warm feathered body has a robust, yet rapid motion.
Livelifelivelifelivelifelivelivelive...goes the beat of bravery.
If
I was kind, I'd release it, but the urge to collect, to keep for a
short time, has a will of its own, so in it goes into a grey shoebox
with a crude perforated lid. I had one, now I have two. One, a risk;
two, better odds for unfocused individuals who give refuge to the
obstinate belief that two
is worth more, and little convinces them otherwise. What if...how do
I know...should I stay...should I go...should I say yes...should I
say no...should I...should I...should I...
To
weigh up, to compare, to assess, to analyse gives the impression of
autonomy; I have choices I can control, I am the deciding factor. A
false notion as the birds trapped are always free, regardless of
their marked similarities or differences. I am not their master or
their keeper. I can capture but I cannot make them stay. They will
fly or fade away at some point, sometimes for good, sometimes to
return when the moment is ripe. My ego might like to think I'm the
Governor of my circumstances, but outside of my being there's an
influence more far-reaching than I can ever hope to interpret.
And yet
a hunter will always attempt to make a pair.
Picture Credit: Weaver Birds, William de Morgan