skip to main |
skip to sidebar
I'm in
a nothingy kind of place where I'm weighing up if this might be
it...and I think it might be. I'm wondering how, if, I can come to
terms with it. Perhaps I have already. Accepted it as already passed.
This
disconnectedness set to last, measured by the time I have left which
for all I know could be eternity if science continues its leaps and
pushes. Is this how it is to be some sort of New Age astronaut with
my brain permanently encased in a bubble?
There
is nothing here. I feel nothing here.
There
is no meaning, no emotion. Just a vast, blank emptiness where nothing
is related. No pinpricks of planets or stars to illuminate the
blackness. No space dust to examine as it floats by, and even if
there was I'm not sure it would arouse my once human curiosity.
Humanness
is no longer an existence I have any conception of, although the
brain still thinks as if it were always separate from and outside the
body. There's nothing to quantify its being so it survives
independently, freed from its shackles but persisting in its thinking
as 'I'. That attachment has not been severed, yet.
Give it
time and I, whatever this I describes: who I was or who I am now,
might join the cosmos. Merge with the dark pool and cease
individualised thinking, possibly cease thinking altogether. Maybe
consciousness too will lose its current importance, but right now
this need for an independent identity is all I have left. In mind
alone.
The
body, or the vehicle as I shall refer to it from this moment
forwards, was abandoned relatively recently when it became apparent
it did not serve. It functioned but was unfit for purpose for I (and
I was then what is generally comprehended as an I) had surpassed it.
The inclination to possess a physical property had grown less and
less with frequent civil wars that couldn't be contained or
pacified. The threats of unrest were never empty. Naturally, I became
disenchanted presiding over this warring state and so escaped into
the world of the mind. And once there, I was enthralled.
My
experience of the mind is that it operates much like a hotel:
reception is always frantically busy with arrivals, departures and
requests from staying guests, whereas the lounge is an oasis of calm.
The floor assigned to VIPs is huge with plenty of rooms to choose
from, all of which are designed to ponder and pontificate in. It
doesn't matter if you only hear your own response, so grateful are
you for the space to hear what you alone have to think and say.
However,
retreats if retired to too often have a habit of descending into
permanency. The benefits on each occasion multiplying, the desire to
stay too great to discard.
The
vehicle for a time does fine without you. Its voluntary and
involuntary functions continue as before when you were more present,
and so your attention is diverted to a greater extent, drawn ever
inward, until you reach a point where you consider it surplus to
requirements. You have no need of it yet it does not desist from
needing you, and takes up energy that could be better spent on
intellectual matters. The perfunctory glances, which you felt it
deserved, are disregarded completely, as are observations of events –
those events outside yourself which make little or no impact. The I
subconsciously stating it no longer wishes to be troubled by these
worldly affairs.
The
mind is the controller now and the brain its subordinate, though to
be honest with the vehicle deserted that role is largely defunct;
still, it occasionally flickers, lights up its circuits like a
pinball machine just in case or for old time's sake which the mind on
one of its daily rambles barely registers.
The I
that once used to present, in company, an exterior personality yet
live in its head on the quiet has now chosen instead to reside in a
state of nothing.
Picture credit: Hubble Space Telescope, NASA
Animate
beings made up of words have words tattooed inside their skin, like
the silk lining of a suit jacket or winter coat; then there are those
whose cells diffuse colours in vivid hues in the style of a Jackson
Pollack; and then those whose every pulsating organ is a musical note
as if to emulate a great composer like Bach or Debussy. A smaller
number secrete chemical names or mathematical equations through their
nostrils and the Ah of their breath, while a select few have no inner
inscription for their ability outwardly manifests: these are the
athletes or dancers whose performances are fuelled by an interior of
flames.
Of
course, there's commingling amongst these beings. Like attracts like,
opposites are drawn to one another, for all beings either want to be
on the same wave or to have what they lack, to make themselves
stronger or complement. Such pairings or interactions are often
improbable and yet somehow they work, and though observers need a lot
of convincing as to their authenticity, their output when together,
either as a couple or in a professional collaboration, has a rare
quality that mightn't have ever been achieved if they hadn't met or
stayed apart.
The
art, in whatever form it takes, is alive, is life itself, so that
whomever crosses its path, by chance or on purpose, is instantly
enamoured. In love with the finished result and the idea behind the
idea: the inspiration or random thought that sparked the creative
process, which in turn arouses further curiosity as to who is the
artist and whom or what is their guide, for it's always presumed with
works considered great, in their present time or at a later date,
there is such a muse, a critic, a rational voice, a borrowed ear.
Someone that provides encouragement and objectivity and works almost
as tirelessly as the artist. A someone that can nurture and nourish,
and be brutally honest when their opinion is sought, somehow able to
frame their critique in a manner that's permissible; a someone who
can contend with the artist's rages and despondencies, as well as
their retreats and peaks when a piece is progressing well; and a
someone that won't abuse the trust laid on them and can cope too with
being the artist's crutch.
Those
who people the art world in all their glorious shapes are not, as
might be imagined, always natural exhibitionists, which is why a
staff comes in handy to lean upon and can often prove as essential as
a sound pair of walking boots: good support is needed for long,
exhausting journeys where the destination always seem to lie beyond
the next hill or the next bend in the road. Artists for all their
supposed swagger are modest and, although by no means all tortured
souls, are more often than not under considerable strain. Creation
releases and burdens. At best, they are consumed, focussed yet able
to engage; at worst, preoccupied, grappling with details and
inattentive to everyone and everything else.
What
goes on in an artist's brain is hard to explain because art, whilst
tapping into the imagination, is a process of delayed gratification
which often comes in dribbles, say in a single brush-stroke, a
sentence, a note; sometimes it's delayed until the very end or
decades after its making, although dissatisfaction too can also be
true of these instances.
Art is
never motionless, it has its own stream of consciousness, even when
it's divorced from its maker. Words move like waves on the page,
sculptures are fluid and life-like, paintings envelop you, music
swells emotions, carries you with its mood and rhythm, dance and
athletics bring forth a surge of endorphins that cannot be equalled
by any other activity. Makers embody that energy, but onlookers are
touched by it too, which means we all take part in the evolution of
art.
Picture Credit: Rene Magritte, Title Unknown (ABC Gallery)
I'm
very aware of my weaknesses, where I think I fall short, of which
there are many; many which I don't think wise to list, because then
this would become a whine like a air raid siren that begins quietly
and climbs to a penetrating, deafening wail.
Wednesday's
child is full of woe. On the day I was born it also rained, so maybe
I'm not entirely to blame for my default setting. However, I thought
with the passing of time I had mastered my self-criticism; apparently
not. It's just got cleverer: unpicked distraction techniques and
positive affirmations, to slip in through undefended crevices;
fissures so tiny you wouldn't think it was possible for a negative id
to crawl under or squeeze through, because generally speaking they
take up and need a lot of room. More space than the average mind
possesses, and mine has neither the power or the inclination to be
super-brainy, and so these breaches will happen.
Yet
each time my security system comes under attack I feign surprise, as
if my bluff will be enough to see off my opponent. Sometimes she
calls it and worms her way in with her insidious voice, sometimes she
realises that the mere threat suffices. My sensitive conscience
pricked and on high alert! Anxiety then dominates for the next
twenty-four to forty-eight hours but when nothing untoward happens,
other than uncovering the usual thorns, this dissipates to a standard
awareness, which at a later date is followed by complacency.
My
opponent, ever the optimist in spite of her pessimistic remarks,
waits...bides her time until a false state has been declared. Then
when I'm 'up' and there's no need for me to believe a 'down' is
likely, in she seeks to mess about with the circuitry. And that
sudden blip in the wiring, though it may be short-lived, can lead to
a pitiable condition, one where nothing thought or said is
affirmative and the outlook in which I view the world and my place in
it has been severely altered, twisted beyond recognition.
The
beating up is never physical, but is nonetheless damaging because the
opponent is an verbal invisible self, and it's harder to combat that
which is part of you. Her barbed tone is instantly recognisable as my
own despite the difference in language: her terms are deeply
critical, open old wounds and produce new ones. The old though
they've scabbed many times over reopen easily with a little gentle
prodding to renew their tired aspersions, while the new gush fresh
abuses more relevant to recent situations. You're not this, you're
not that; you're not worthy of such and such; you don't deserve (fill
in the blank); along with other personal put-downs connected to
non-existent looks and abilities.
At its
centre is a hard stone like that of a fruit, a stone that would crack
teeth if it hadn't at some point during the course of the lifetime
been swallowed and furnished with sanctuary. Then when proven mad
moved to an asylum on the peripheries, but find access is still
achievable if the target is overwhelmed or unoccupied. Such
violations are recurring and inevitable once that stone has resided
within; it can never be banished completely, even though the days of
equilibrium might outnumber its exile, because as I said it's sneaky.
And surprisingly good at it.
Functioning,
rather than behaving dysfunctionally, becomes then the main objective
to living or trying to get as close as you can to a semblance of it,
rather than letting that voice of low self-esteem wreak its havoc.
Except you can't always avoid listening, no matter how destructive
you know it is, because to deny is denying that shameful part of you
exists. That she is also you and not the enemy. She is like a bundle
of cells that have gone askew. She may not be nice but she is a
reaction to life and knows no different. To crush is not the way.
Small
victories is the game that must be played so that her undeniable
presence, even when on the peripheries, hovering like a bird eyeing
its prey, becomes less disturbing and more of a fact. She'll always
be there, watching...
Picture credit: Wings of Victory, Erte
I have
this itch; an itch that develops into a unsightly raised rash which
of course I scratch. And scratch. And claw at to relieve the sporadic
irritation. It didn't, it doesn't, but it sure feels good, as does
everything you're told NOT to do.
The
itch can be bothersome, but the randomness of its location is more
so. A few years ago it was the inside of my right calf, now it's my
right elbow. It relocates yet leaves no trace: no scar, no mark of
its occupancy, as if it were a hotel guest who enjoys making their
presence felt during their stay, then departs without a goodbye or
thank you, and yet leaves the room scrupulously neat with a nominal
tip for housekeeping.
This
itch, like my analogy to the hotel guest, is paradoxical. Its whims
are met, it calms, it begins to clear, then acts up or disappears. I
never know if it will completely go or come back. The nature of its
repeat residence is deeply mystifying, but grown used to its
unpredictability I only give it half of the attention it deserves. I
placate it with nonchalance and accept its idiomaticness, for to do
otherwise would be hypocritical when self-expression is a principle I
honour. My body should be permitted to exercise that right in a
physical language, and though I may not understand it, the right
shouldn't be suppressed or denied.
That
there is a message is clear, however the language is foreign and of
such complexity that it cannot be translated easily into English, nor
can I imagine into any other. It would take years of applied study. A
study I have begun but not, so far, got beyond the preschool grade,
which is not a surprise seeing as I still struggle to get by with my
GCSE German and French. And that's with the assistance of
dictionaries and phrase books.
With
this, I'm completely in the dark. I can't make a lucky guess or fake
my comprehension because the body wouldn't for one minute be fooled.
To have successfully interpreted the physical symptom I'd have to
have changed the pattern that caused it; when you don't the symptom
persists: nags or worsens over time.
And
obviously with my ineptitude for languages I fall into that
unsuccessful camp.
The
itch and the subsequent rash have become my familiars, of the sort
that you think almost fondly of when they're off the scene, yet when
in their company long to be rid of, and who if they realise they're
being provoking only needle more. You, in turn, or I, in this
instance, attempt to control, sometimes barely, your diminishing
hospitable temper. As mentioned I have on more than one occasion
failed in this regard, and not learned that in permitting even a
single scratch I inflame the situation and confirm my compliance.
The
itch then has the upper hand as if it belongs to an applauding
audience member who continues to clap long after everyone else has
stopped and so the cast is held in a protracted pause. The action
then as with this is arrogant and intentional, particularly as the
applauding individual is clearly visible to those around him, but
indistinguishable from the stage.
The
bringing together of hands, a pair or a united affair, in either
appropriate or inappropriate places petitions the actors to delay, to
play, or to take repeated bows and give encores until the thunderous
applause shows signs of abating. Which it usually does when the cast
wearily departs the stage and the curtain falls. Then a hush
descends...will they come out again? No, the lights have gone up. The
murmur rises as persons vacate their seats and shuffle to their
nearest exit.
Collaboration.
That's what it amounts to, as although the execution might seem
unequal the balance of power can and does shift. Sometimes with ease,
sometimes with extreme difficulty as in an unresolvable conflict. The
audience and the theatre cast can afford to make concessions, because
both roles, for the most part, are scripted, whereas the itch and the
individual are forever engaged in an improvised play with an
unwritten ending.
Picture credit: Applause, Erte