Which
foot do you lead off with? Without thinking because the brain knows
it's a given and the command is too strong to override: this is your
dominant side and therefore it naturally follows that this foot
should take the first stride. Instinctively, it pushes off as if it
were the more outgoing courageous twin to which the shyer twin will
always fall in with, although the choice not to does not exist as
does the choice to assert some authority. That only occurs when the
reserve has to lead for some reason and when again the choice not to
isn't even an option.
And
here, as in there – the paragraph above, just to make it clear, I'm
talking limbs and not twins. Because we like to think, perhaps at
times condescendingly so, as twins as individuals, which they are,
but they also come as a pair like legs, and will lead or follow and
reverse that order according to their comfortableness in each
situation. Feet and legs can do that but it takes more thought to
adapt and it usually only occurs when one is incapacitated. That
there is a hierarchy in the body however should come as no surprise
since its communication network undoubtedly formed our organisational
structures i.e. business has borrowed the idea many times over. Don't
you agree? Well that's my theory anyway; one that I'm sticking to and
that I imagine has been voiced before. I wouldn't have the audacity
to claim it as my own – who do you think I am? I'm just a humble
servant. To my body. To nature. To man, by which I mean others, in
the service to and of.
And
this humble servant hasn't conducted a survey which could turn the
whole dominance theory on its head. What if, unbeknownst to us, we
all push off with the same foot? And the notion that it's always the
same foot as the hand with which we write is presumed? If that was
the case this theorising would be held up as a joke, is in fact
already a joke (yes, as quickly as all that) to be summed up
succinctly as: an hypothesis put forward by an uneducated woman of no
sound scientific or medical knowledge has been swiftly disproved
because she was too bent on sharing her views and forgot to do
preliminary research.
Actually, that
prediction is about to be realised, and by my own foot too – the
left one. For in walking to answer the phone and then circling the
living-cum-dining-room-cum-kitchen I've noticed that my left foot is
not always the first to launch itself; sometimes, against all odds
(those in my head) the right foot leads, and entirely of its own
accord. Although I also have to report that seven times out of ten
the left foot commands the way. And so typically, as is my habit,
I've undermined my own attempt to prove anything, though it's never
anything of any significance anyway. Too many anys, too many
possibilities. Which is me in a nutshell: greedy.
But
I have qualified (to myself) one thing: that lefties are not, as one
Italian writer put it, less
predictable, they're unpredictable.
In every definition of the word. I'm not sure we have a Commander.
Well, obviously the brain, but it is I think more susceptible to
whims, creative or orderly. In a left-dominant body order is chaotic
rather than rational. You might say: can it be called order at all? I
might answer: it's a functioning disorder in a right-sided world. At
one time it was seen as a disability: people were forced to write
with their right hand, but now, as much as they're able, lefties make
their own adaptations, and even catch those not versed in these ways
off guard. I, for example, can't always control my arms; they're
quite independent of me, whereas left-footed footballers give the
appearance of being in control and, deliberately or unintentionally,
fool the goalie. The same I think must apply with throwing punches or
possibly karate kicks. Limbs (and their appendages) don't always go,
least of all land, where you think, where you hope, you're directing
them, and neither does for that matter the predominantly left-sided
brain.
In
command, left is nomadic in style. As if it recollects being uprooted
from anywhere it called 'Home', or ancient times when lands lay
unnamed or even unpeopled. Charted courses are viewed with contempt
and uncommon methods toyed with, not however to simplify nor reach
the intended goal but to widen the net into which if it likes it
might (or might not) sail.
Picture credit: The Football Match, L S Lowry